{"id":2805,"date":"2026-01-19T22:45:22","date_gmt":"2026-01-19T22:45:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/peoplescenteredhumanrights.com\/?p=2805"},"modified":"2026-01-19T22:52:54","modified_gmt":"2026-01-19T22:52:54","slug":"trumps-one-big-beautiful-bill-act-as-the-architecture-of-domestic-repression-a-peoples-centered-human-rights-critique","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/peoplescenteredhumanrights.com\/es\/trumps-one-big-beautiful-bill-act-as-the-architecture-of-domestic-repression-a-peoples-centered-human-rights-critique\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump\u2019s One Big Beautiful Bill Act as the Architecture of Domestic Repression: A People(s)-Centered Human Rights Critique"},"content":{"rendered":"

Trump\u2019s One Big Beautiful Bill Act as the Architecture of Domestic Repression: A People(s)-Centered Human Rights Critique<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The so-called \u201c<\/em>One Big Beautiful Bill<\/a> \u201d<\/em> (OBBBA), the first major signature piece of legislation of the Trump administration, was signed into law by President Donald Trump on July 4, 2025. Marketed with the usual populist bravado, the bill was in fact a sweeping and reactionary package that advanced tax cuts for capital while imposing draconian changes to healthcare funding, including rollbacks of Affordable Care Act subsidies and deep cuts to Medicaid.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Beyond healthcare, however, the OBBBA codified a broader and more dangerous trajectory: the continued erosion of state obligations to uphold fundamental human rights norms rooted in both domestic and international law. Nowhere is this retreat more evident than in the provisions targeting migrant workers and their families. These measures reflect an intensification of the racialized logic of exclusion that has long structured U.S. governance\u2014transforming immigration enforcement into an openly punitive regime that treats migrants not as rights-bearing human beings but as disposable labor and permanent threats to the settler state\u2019s political imagination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From a people(s)-centered human rights perspective, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) should not be understood primarily as a fiscal or administrative reform. It should be understood as a repressive restructuring of state power<\/strong> that subordinates human needs to security logics, criminalizes survival, and weaponizes precarity \u2014 particularly against migrants and their families.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The People(s)-Centered Human Rights framework<\/a> rejects the narrow, state-centric notion of rights as abstract legal entitlements and instead centers the material conditions necessary for human dignity, collective survival, and social reproduction<\/strong>. From this perspective, rights are not gifts from states but social guarantees rooted in the dignity and objective needs of individuals, peoples and communities. The OBBBA represents a direct assault on those guarantees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1. Health as a Human Right vs. Health as a Tool of Control<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The OBBBA\u2019s restrictions on Medicaid, Medicare, and Affordable Care Act access for undocumented migrants and some legal immigrants transform healthcare from a universal human right into a disciplinary mechanism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights<\/strong> <\/strong>(Article 25)<\/strong>,<\/a> everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for health and well-being, including medical care. The International Convention on the Rights of Migrants and their Families<\/strong> (Articles 28 and 43<\/strong><\/a>)<\/strong> affirms migrants\u2019 rights to emergency medical care and equal access to social services, while the Convention on the Rights of the Child<\/strong> (CRC) (Article 24<\/strong><\/a>)<\/strong> establishes children\u2019s right to the highest attainable standard of health \u2014 regardless of status.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

By excluding migrants from healthcare systems, the state is not simply saving money; it is producing vulnerability<\/strong> and denying the most basic of human rights.  This manufactured vulnerability disciplines migrant labor, suppresses resistance, and enforces silence. When people fear medical systems, they delay treatment, avoid hospitals, and risk death rather than risk deportation. Illness becomes a mechanism of control.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This violates the people(s)-centered principle that social institutions should exist to sustain life, not manage it through suffering<\/strong> and fear.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2. Fear as a Governing Technology<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The OBBBA does not merely restrict benefits; it generates fear. Migrants increasingly avoid schools, clinics, social workers, and even emergency services due to fear of surveillance, data-sharing, or exposure to immigration enforcement. This fear spills beyond migrants themselves and fractures entire communities. With the unleashing of ICE by the Trump Administration reports are circulating on the increasing numbers of undocumented migrants who are afraid to report to work sites, shop for food or even send their children to school.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The CRC (Article 28)<\/strong> guarantees children\u2019s right to education. Yet when parents fear deportation, children stop attending school. The UDHR (Articles 22 and 26)<\/strong> affirms rights to social security and education, but those rights are hollow when accessing them risks family separation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From a people(s)-centered lens, fear itself is a form of violence. It is a slow, cumulative harm that restructures behavior, isolates communities, and erodes trust. The OBBBA thus governs not only through law but through psychological coercion<\/strong>, transforming everyday life into a field of surveillance and risk.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

3. Criminalization of Survival<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The OBBBA expands enforcement while shrinking support. This produces what could only be understood as the criminalization of existence<\/strong>: people are punished not for crimes but for living while poor, undocumented, racialized, or politically disposable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Work becomes dangerous. Seeking medical care becomes dangerous. Sending children to school becomes dangerous. This violates the ICRMW\u2019s core principle<\/strong> that migrants are workers and social beings with non-negotiable human rights.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

4. The Racialized Structure of Repression<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Although framed as neutral policy, the OBBBA functions within a racialized political economy. Migrants targeted by its provisions are overwhelmingly from the Global South, Indigenous, Black, or Brown. The withdrawal of social protections follows the same colonial logic that governs U.S. foreign policy: discipline peripheral populations while securing the comfort of the core. That is why domestic repression and foreign imperialism are not separate phenomena. The OBBBA mirrors sanctions regimes abroad: deny resources, create crisis, and justify social control.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

5. Collective Harm, Not Individual Misfortune<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

A people(s)-centered framework rejects the liberal tendency to see suffering as individual failure. The OBBBA continues the legacy of systemic oppression and non-recognition of human rights in U.S. law and practice that produces systemic harm<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n